I wrote: >> So I vote for requiring SH pragmas in all >> platform packages already for 2013.2.0.0. >> We can defer the final decision. But it >> will very much help getting things moving >> if we officially say that SH pragmas >> are highly recommended for 2012.4.0.0, >> and likely to be *required* for 2013.2.0.0.
Gregory Collins wrote: > I'm uncomfortable with this kind of a diktat without a plan for who's > actually going to do the work. Any volunteers? Well, "the work" is sending out a short email to the package maintainers of the packages that do not have Safe Haskell pragmas yet - about half of them. The email should be a request to add a Trustworthy pragma at the top of each publicly exposed module in their package, with a brief explanation. If no one else is up to that, I'd be happy to do it if we decide to go that way. I glanced through the packages in the platform not yet done. The only packages where I saw any issues were vector, which is under discussion, and network, where the unsafe interface that pokes into memory already appears to be neatly separated out into Network.Socket.Internal. The network package is also maintained by Johan. Does anyone see anything that I missed? Thanks, Yitz _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
