On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

What should we do about this?  There has been NO discussion of this API.  
Possibilities

·         Adopt the package with a new name, like vector-prim or 
vector-internal, implying that it’s for
people doing vector-stuff, rather than for end users.  (And say that in the 
docs.)

+1

·         Absorb it into the vector package, which is currently its only client 
(we think).

-1 because I think it could be useful for alternative packages (like storablevector, but it does not use 'primitive' currently)

·         Absorb it into the base package.  But we are generally trying to 
reduce base not increase it.

-1

_______________________________________________
Haskell-platform mailing list
Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org
http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Reply via email to