On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, wren ng thornton <w...@freegeek.org> wrote: > > I'm all for momentum towards Safe Haskell. But I'd really rather not revisit > our previous discussion on that matter. I'd say we should: > > (1) add vector to the Platform, sans .Safe modules > (2) move the less objective/objectionable packages towards Safe Haskell, in > order to instill that as a virtue and to get some empirical data about how > users interact with Safe Haskell > (3) revisit the Safe Haskell + vector issues once Safe Haskell is more > popular and we have some better ideas what the practical arguments are (as > opposed to just the theoretical ones).
Agreed. Let's get vector into the Platform as if Safe Haskell never existed, and revisit it later if it becomes something that we need. _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
