On 1/24/13 4:03 AM, Gregory Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:04 AM, wren ng thornton <w...@freegeek.org>wrote:
One potential concern I have is about how inclusion affects future
development; i.e., I forget whether this means following the Libraries
process from now on, or not. A quick look at the HP wiki didn't find
anything answering this directly.
IIRC from discussions in the past, HP package maintainers will continue to
maintain their packages as they see fit. Inclusion in the HP raises the bar
slightly on doing your best to avoid breaking code (maintaining backwards
compatibility wherever possible and doing a proper deprecation cycle
wherever not), but I'd like to think that we generally nominate
high-quality packages with responsible maintainers who are aware of these
issues.
Sounds good. I thought that's how it was but just wanted to make sure.
--
Live well,
~wren
_______________________________________________
Haskell-platform mailing list
Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org
http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
