On 21 March 2013 06:54, wren ng thornton <w...@freegeek.org> wrote: > One concern with the above approach: is "siphash" a sufficiently generic > name, or is it just one hashing method that happens to deflect this DoS > issue? I haven't read the paper, so...
One could of course generalize the above method using something like: -- A type hashed as h newtype Hashed h a = Hashed a instance (HashableAs h a) => Hashable (Hashed h a) where hashWithSalt = hashWithSaltAs class HashableAs h a where hashWithSaltAs :: Int -> Hashed h a -> Int data Sip sip :: a -> Hashed Sip a sip = Hashed instance HashableAs Sip Text where hashWithSaltAs salt (Hashed x) = sipHashWithSalt salt x instance HashableAs Sip ByteString where ... Regards, Bas _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
