hashable bump is good. I'm also pro shipping a newer Cabal, if it doesn't cause any issues with the one that already comes with GHC.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Mark Lentczner <mark.lentcz...@gmail.com>wrote: > I know it is late, and so I've done some preliminary version sleuthing.... > Here's my proposal for HP 2013.4.0.0. I know this e-mail's is long - but > hoping to hear from all relevant parties soon. > > *GHC 7.6.3* -- this is a compiler bump, but all the included packages > remain at the same version as 2013.2.0.0 > > *Packages with no changes:* > fgl, haskell-src, html, HTTP, HUnit, > mtl, parsec, QuickCheck, random, > regex-base, regex-compat, regex-posix, > split, stm, text, transformers, > xhtml, zlib > > *Packages with minor version bumps:* > *I'll advance these automatically this time - no need for maintainer input* > cgi: 3001.1.7.5 → 3001.1.8.4 > network: 2.4.1.2 → 2.4.2.0 > parallel: 3.2.0.3 → 3.2.0.4 > syb: 0.4.0 → 0.4.1 > unordered-containers: 0.2.3.0 → 0.2.3.3 > vector: 0.10.0.1 → 0.10.9.1? > primitive: 0.5.0.1 → 0.5.1.0? > > *Packages with major version bumps:* > *I'd like to get confirmation from the maintainers of these packages that > this bump is "the right thing to do". The bump should ideally only add API, > and not orphan any program that used to compile under the HP - at least not > without a good reason.* > case-insensitive: 1.0.0.1 → 1.1.0.1 > hashable: 1.1.2.5 → 1.2.1.0 > > GLUT: 2.4.0.0 → 2.5.0.1 > GLURaw: 1.3.0.0 → 1.4.0.0 > OpenGL: 2.8.0.0 → 2.9.1.0 > OpenGLRaw: 1.3.0.0 → 1.4.0.0 > > alex: 3.0.5 → 3.1.0 > happy: 1.18.10 → 1.19.0 > > *New Packages:* > *There was prior discussion on the libraries mailing list, and generally > all around resounding "YES!" for including aeson.* > *I think we should include it. I'm looking for confirmation from the > maintainer that this is the right version to include.* > aeson: 0.6.2.1 > > *Cabal:* > *The Cabal 1.18 release was a major new release, including the very very > useful sandbox feature. This would require shipping a different Cabal lib > than the version shipped with the included GHC. I'm not sure of the > implications of doing this - in particular, whether we would have to ship > two Cabal packages or just the later.* > Cabal: 1.16.0 → 1.18.1.2 > cabal-install: 1.16.0.2 → 1.18.0.2 > > What do you all think? > > — Mark "late, but not forgotten" Lentczner > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > librar...@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
