On 2013-11-14 09:50, Sean Leather wrote: > I think it might be better to continue the dlist discussion on a separate > thread. For a recap, see below. [--snip--] > But at the moment, to avoid unnecessary controversy and to give the new > code some time to mature, I recommend that dlist is *not* added to the > platform. >
+1 Considering the nearness of the next HP release and the fact that dlist isn't in the HP yet, I don't see any need to rush it. (Particularly if you want to make some potentially backwards-incompatible changes soon ;)) Regards, _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
