On 31 March 2014 05:06, Mark Lentczner <mark.lentcz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Haddock* - is there any reason not to use the version built and > distributed with GHC 7.8? > from the package perspective also, +1 for continuing to use the haddock in ghc. *shipped with GHC, but not registered in pkg-db, yet possible useful to > include in platform:* > > - haskeline-0.7.1.2 > - terminfo-0.4.0.0 > - xhtml-3000.2.1 -- already in platform, but HP re-builds it... > seems silly > > I would like to see ghc shipping these libs registered. *hscolour* - never approved as part of platform, but we use it to generate > the haddock in both GHC and the Platform - shouldn't we just include it? > +1 I actually wish it could be included in ghc too, next to haddock. > aeson > > dlist (needed by aeson, which version?) > > Sounds good to me. I am all for more libraries in Platform. Jens
_______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
