On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, John Hughes wrote: > Wouldn't there be quite a lot of warnings? > > I really think we have to remember beginners' problems here. I know noone > reading this discussion is > one, but without beginners, there will be no growth in the Haskell community. > If we did as you suggest, > then beginners would be confronted by yet another kind of incomprehensible > message--and I fear it > would be hard to report that x=e risks evaluating e many times, in a way that > would be viewed as positive > by someone still trying to understand how Haskell works at all. >
Insist the warnings be available, don't require them to be in the standard warning level? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The task of the academic is not to scale great intellectual mountains, but to flatten them. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
