john: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0000, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > There is a potential confusion here between the H-core language as used > > in the Haskell'98 report, and ghc's current external-core language. > > The former contains classes, and the latter does not. Ghc-core has > > type-lambdas, but H-core does not. Ghc-core has unboxed values, > > H-core does not. > > Yeah, core is a pretty overloaded term in haskell. Here I was definitly > thinking of Haskell Core, as in a subset of haskell' that is still pure > haskell and will compile via any haskell' compiler. I try to get in the > habit of alway saying the full haskell core, ghc core, or jhc core (is > there an nhc core?) but sometimes get sloppy.
Oh, I use "Core" for GHC's IR, and "the Haskell core" for the lang in the report. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
