Ravi Nanavati wrote:
 > Multi-parameter type classes, yes.  Functional dependencies, no.

My experience is that even with very simple applications of MPTCs,
I often end up needing functional dependencies to make things work.


As a user, I'll echo this.

Me three, etc.

Might it be worth holding off on MPTCs altogether if we don't also have fundeps or associated types?

--
Ashley Yakeley

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to