Applying the rules on the wiki, the first step is to translate the first _expression_ into a tuple binding, omitting the implicit ~:

 

Not so!  I changed it a few days ago after talking to Ben, to a simpler form that works nicely for recursive bindings too.  Darn – I forgot to change the rules at the bottom.

 

Anyway, read the section “Let and where bindings”. Sorry about the rules at the end.

 

Simon

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to