Ben Rudiak-Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> that i want to say is what the first variant allows to define type of
>>> 'x' in such way that the only Show-specific operations are allowed,
>> Why?
>
> Parametricity, what else? I'd much rather pass my precious String to a
> function of type [a] -> [a] or Functor a => a Char -> a Char than to a
> function of type String -> String.
But he is writing the function inline. It doesn't matter whether it's
polymorphic when it's ever applied only to a string written in the
very same line.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
