Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
Myself I'm of the view transformational patterns (as described in http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/299277.html) are more interesting - I can't help wondering why they were never implemented?
Maybe because of tricky semantics. I'm not quite sure what
case x of
(y,z)!f -> ...
where f _ = (z,3)
should desugar to.
-- Ben
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
