On 2006-03-28, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another piece of terminology to clear up. By "non-blocking foreign > call", you actually mean a foreign call that *can* block. As a > consequence of the fairness policy, you wish to place the requirement on > implementations that such a blocking foreign call _should_not_ > block progress of other Haskell threads. The thread-nature of the > foreign call is "blocking". The Haskell-API nature is desired to be > "non-blocking".
*glyph of enlightenment*. Ah, no wonder a lot of the discussion and docs didn't seem to make sense. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
