On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 05:58:24PM +0100, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> Or do what I suggested in
> http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/haskell-prime/2006-March/001120.html
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and make seq a
> pragma. It really doesn't matter that pragmas in C are
> optional: we don't have to follow that.
Would that really change that much. Anyone who likes the old
seq function (less characters to type than with pragma) will
be able to define it:
seq a b = {-# SEQ a #-} b
Perhaps if you allowed syntax for forcing many expressions
people would be more willing to use it:
{-# SEQ a, b, c, d #-} e
Best regards
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
