Hello David, Saturday, April 1, 2006, 4:31:05 PM, you wrote:
> I'd like to be sure that asynchronous exceptions can get into the standard. > They require concurrency, but I'm not sure that they're included in John's > page. this an another ticket > It would also be nice to address signal behavior, and by default state that > signals should be converted to asynchronous exceptions. it was surprise for me that i don't receive ^Break as an exception and should do something special to handle this. on the other side, in more complex setting involving lengthy FFI calls, ghc's solution is the only way to let know to this FFI function that it should abort his execution -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
