On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Cale Gibbard wrote: > Of course I disagree with this course for all the reasons I stated > above. The whole point of having high level programming languages is > so that you can put more work into the tools so that the end user > doesn't have to work as hard. One shouldn't ask "What's easiest to > parse?" but "What's easiest to read and write?". >
A good many tools can, of course, get by on a reversible desugaring. It seems to me that this'd be a sensible candidate for a library. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'In Ankh-Morpork even the shit have a street to itself... Truly this is a land of opportunity.' - Detritus, Men at Arms _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
