On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Yitzchak Gale wrote: > Philippa Cowderoy wrote: > > > I don't find it any more confusing than the overloading > > > of ->. > > I wrote: > > You mean that it is used both for lambda abstractions > > and for functional dependencies? True, but those > > are so different that there is no confusion. > > Oh, and case. Also quite different.
This is what I get for replying straight away! > Anyway, existing problems are not an excuse to > repeat the mistake and make matters even worse. > I think my point is that I'm not aware of many people who actually think this is a problem or get confused. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no magic bullet. There are, however, plenty of bullets that magically home in on feet when not used in exactly the right circumstances. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
