On 11 Jul 2007, at 08:38, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Another alternative (which I got from Greg Morrisett) that I'm
toying with is this. It's tiresome to write
do { x <- <stuff1>
; y <- <sutff2>
; f x y }
In ML I'd write simply
f <stuff1> <stuff2>
Using Control.Applicative you could already write:
f <$> x <*> y
I don't see the immediate need for more syntactic sugar - this is
about as concise as it can get and it does not require compiler
extensions.
All the best,
Wouter
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
