Simon Peyton Jones wrote: > Not allowing infix functions on the LHS would be a notable > simplification.
This would significantly weaken a useful property of Haskell, that definitions and uses often share the same concrete syntax. It's very natural to be able to define things that way and it would be a real shame to lose it (and I think it would break a lot of existing code). > In any case, I've always thought this was weird: > Just x == Just y = x == y It takes a little getting used to, but I don't find it that weird. I wouldn't mind if just infix definitions of (!) were banned, though of course that would be an unpleasant non-orthogonality. Cheers, Ganesh ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html ============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
