Would it not be cleaner just to disallow infix notation of qualified
operators altogether? It is clear enough to use "import qualified" or
let or where clauses containing prefix notation to identify a qualified
operator with an unqualified one:
UGLY:
m `Prelude.(>>=)` a
`Prelude.(>>=)` b
`Prelude.(>>=)` c
CLEAR:
m >>= a >>= b >>= c
where (>>=) = Prelude.(>>=)
[Personally, I prefer where to let for such purely syntactic details].
Dan
Simon Marlow wrote:
Folks,
Please comment on the following proposed change to qualified operator
syntax:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/QualifiedOperators
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
