Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2008 01:20 schrieb Duncan Coutts: > […] > Surely there was a justification to having $ be the opposite > associativity from application and not just a different precedence. Does > anyone know what it was?
Probably the fact that you can write > f $ g $ h $ u $ v $ w $ x instead of > f (g (h (u (v (w x))))) and thereby avoid building forests of parantheses. > Duncan Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
