I've suggested some sort of standardization of the LANGUAGE pragma as well. Given our new modular, yearly approach to standardization, it does seem worth trying to formalize it.
- Ravi On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Bulat Ziganshin<bulat.zigans...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Duncan, > > Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 2:15:42 AM, you wrote: > >> For one thing the spec currently says that pragmas cannot change the >> semantics of the program. That would have to read "apart from the >> LANGUAGE pragma". > > sometime ago i've proposed to make a "language" statement a part of > haskell. i don't insist on this but at least keep this possibility in > mind - making it a pragma is a poor man solution > > > -- > Best regards, > Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime > _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
