Hello Simon, Thursday, July 9, 2009, 3:46:31 PM, you wrote:
> This would be a bold step, in that we would be effectively standardising > a lot more libraries than the current language standard. The base > package is a fairly random bag of library modules, for instance. It The base library is under the question, but remaining libs of ghc/HP are in rather good shape of course, without base we can't do even i/o, so questions still remains. in particular, you plan to do something with base in 6.12 although it was not yet decided what exactly so these two discussions (what to do with libs in 6.12 and what to do with libs in Report) may go together ideally, we would split base into smaller and versionable packages. at least in form of interfaces, while implementations will just import everything from base -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
