On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 12/07/2009 22:32, hask...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
Should the consistency with operator section also be added as 'cons' to
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/QualifiedOperators
?
So correct me if I'm wrong; the point you're making is:
left section right section prefix
unqualified (+ 1) (1 +) (+)
Haskell 98 (M.+ 1) (1 M.+) (M.+)
proposed (`M.(+)` 1) (1 `M.(+)`) M.(+)
or(*) (M.(+) 1) (flip M.(+) 1)
(*) only if precedence isn't important, e.g. not in cases like (`M.(+)` x
`M.(*)` y).
Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for working it out!
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
