On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Simon Marlow<marlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15/07/2009 15:54, Ian Lynagh wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 03:39:55PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: >>> >>> But there's a solution: we could remove the "standard" modules from >>> base, and have them only provided by haskell-std (since base will just >>> be a re-exporting layer on top of base-internals, this will be easy to >>> do). Most packages will then have dependencies that look like >>> >>> build-depends: base-4.*, haskell-std-2010 >> >> We'll probably end up with situations where one dependency of a package >> needs haskell-std-2010, and another needs haskell-std-2011. I don't know >> which impls support that at the moment. > > That's the case with base-3/base-4 at the moment. Is it a problem?
Could I use two packages of arrow code which depend on base 3.0.2 and base 3.0.3, respectively, in the same project? -- Dave Menendez <d...@zednenem.com> <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/> _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
