Iavor Diatchki wrote:
Hello, I am strongly against this change. The record notation works just fine and has been doing so for a long time. The notation is really not that confusing and, given how records work in Haskell, makes perfect sense (and the notation has nothing to do with the precedence of application because there are no applications involved). In short, I am not sure what problem is addressed by this change, while a very real problem (backwards incompatibility) would be introduced. -Iavor
a different approach to things that look funny, has been to implement a warning message in GHC. Would that be a good alternative?
-Isaac _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
