On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:24:55PM -0800, John Meacham wrote: > What would be the actual change proposed? If it is something concrete > and not something like "negatives should be interpreted as unary minus > when otherwise it would lead to a parse error" then that wouldn't be > good. I have enough issues with the layout rule as is :)
I imagine it would be something like deleting the production lexp6 -> - exp7 and adding the production exp10 -> - fexp _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime