On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:24:55PM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> What would be the actual change proposed? If it is something concrete
> and not something like "negatives should be interpreted as unary minus
> when otherwise it would lead to a parse error" then that wouldn't be
> good. I have enough issues with the layout rule as is :)
I imagine it would be something like deleting the production
lexp6 -> - exp7
and adding the production
exp10 -> - fexp
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
