Christian Maeder schrieb: > S. Doaitse Swierstra schrieb: >> weird :: Int -> Int >> weird = (if True then 3 else 5+)
[...] > infixexp -> fexp qop infixexp > | exp10 This is no good, because it would exclude: do ... ++ do expressions. > It would be even possible to avoid parenthesis around sections, because > a leading or trailing operator (or just a single operator) uniquely > determines the kind of expression. Maybe this is a solution to the above problem, because "5+" could be legally parsed (and only rejected during type inference). C. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
