On 12/02/2012, at 01:29, Nate Soares wrote: > If -> was introduced for accessing fields, we'd have to discuss whether it > should have spaces around it. I'd lean towards requiring that it have no > spaces when used for field access, for symmetry with "." when used for module > access.
I'm not spaces matter in this case, -> is a reserved token so we would just have expressions of the form expr -> field with no special lexical rules. BTW, if -> doesn't work for some reason then there is also => which AFAIK isn't used in expressions at all currently. Roman _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
