In the index of the pdf version of the Haskell2010 report at http://www.haskell.org/definition/haskell2010.pdf there is still mentioning of n+k patterns:
page 209 first column, where it says "see also n+k patterns`' (which does not exist) page 305, second column under patterns Doaitse _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
