> This standardization process amounts to "endorsement of existing > features" which seems like not a bad process at all. It makes > the standard descriptive rather than predictive. >
+1. I agree generally with Gabor's points -- GHC is in the drivers seat. But at some point we should take a look at all the things GHC has made that did pay off and that are good and make them official. I'd very much like to see that endorsement happen soon, even if it's not aggressive.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
