>>>>> Henrik Nilsson <henrik.nils...@nottingham.ac.uk> writes:
> So before breaking anything more, that being code, research papers, books, > what people have learned, or even the community itself, it is time to very > carefully think about what the appropriate processes should be for going > forward. Hi Henrik, I'd really like to understand your position better, since I'm pretty sure it's not just a juxtaposition between "change" or "no change". How would you like to see Haskell grow in the future? What does a successful process to evolve the language look like to you? Is it the change causing you difficulty, or the way we arrive at the change? John _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
