Or a phabricator instance ? That might also make sense. On Friday, April 29, 2016, Francesco Ariis <fa...@ariis.it> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:56:51PM +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > > One benefit I see from using GitHub is that this way would we be closer > > to the Haskell community (given the majority of Hackage packages are > > hosted on GitHub), and our work would be more transparent for the > > community as well as offering a lower barrier to > > participation/contribution. > > > > Moreover, I think GitHub would also help make our efforts/progress > > towards a revised Haskell Report more visible to the community, which in > > turn may even provide us the motivation to carry on... > > Hello, > personally I would be more likely to read/participate in the > discussions if such discussions were hosted here or on Trac rather > than Github. > haskell-prime@ is just one 'subscribe' away, comes in a familiar package > to haskell-cafe@ participants (a mailing list) and interface (their mail > client); I cannot say the same about Github. > Similarly, Trac allows me to follow new issues (new tickets notifications > or the life of a single ticket in particular) via rss, without having to > register to a new service. > > Of course: > 1. this is just my experience -- there are many haskell > developers on Github and they probably like the workflow > there (I would still say the haskell-cafe@ audience is bigger > though). > 2. I am not a committee member. In the end it's them who are going > to pour blood/sweat/tears in the report; whichever tool the > committee chooses is the right one > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
