On 02/05/2016, Cale Gibbard <cgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > This question implicitly has two parts: > > 1) Are there GHC extensions which the Report ought to describe in their > entirety? ... > > 2) Are there extensions which ought to stop being extensions? ...
I agree here, except as noted in my earlier mail in this thread. An extension i might like to no longer be an extension is NoMonomorphismRestriction, which i haven't yet seen brought up in this thread. I recognize it has some rationale for it, but i surely want this committee to at least re-evaluate its merits. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
