Thank you for your reply. If you are interested in something like this, you may want to start a > discussion of the design on one of the other lists, or perhaps write up a > proposal for GHC. >
While I would like the general area of records getting better in Haskell, I don't think I have the necessary technical chops to lead a GHC proposal around this. Do you know any proposal/extension in GHC that is already trying to solve: (a) records, and/or (b) named arguments? > The proposals currently under discussion are on the `github` URL. > Possible to update the prime.haskell.org website to reflect the current state of affairs? -- Saurabh.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime