Thank you for your reply.

If you are interested in something like this, you may want to start a
> discussion of the design on one of the other lists, or perhaps write up a
> proposal for GHC.
>

While I would like the general area of records getting better in Haskell, I
don't think I have the necessary technical chops to lead a GHC proposal
around this. Do you know any proposal/extension in GHC that is already
trying to solve: (a) records, and/or (b) named arguments?


> The proposals currently under discussion are on the `github` URL.
>

Possible to update the prime.haskell.org website to reflect the current
state of affairs?

-- Saurabh.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to