Either way, see y'all in oxford On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. Hence let's just have something less structured than the GitHub > flow ... just any doc will do. Also it'd be simpler to have just one tool > for coms. > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:55 PM Mario Blažević <blama...@ciktel.net> > wrote: > >> On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote: >> > I'll be this time! :) >> > >> > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. >> > >> > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion. >> > There's still the valid and important need of then taking the >> > discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make >> > the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for >> > ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020 >> >> I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my >> feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something, >> anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real >> danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the >> standard. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-prime mailing list >> Haskell-prime@haskell.org >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >> >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
