On 2018-12-18 2:38 a.m., Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Hello Mario et al.,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM Mario Blažević <blama...@ciktel.net> wrote:
While you're reviewing AMP, please take a bit of time to also comment on
the related new MonadPlus excise proposal at
https://github.com/haskell/rfcs/pull/23
The proposal is very short so it should be an easy decision. Thank you.
As I've explained already on the RFC, I refuse (i.e. to make this very
clear: I'm exercising my veto) to accept the AMP change without also
at least a commitment to MFP and MRP. And note that the committee was
created with the explicit request from SPJ that it ought to be a
consensus-based decision process rather than a democratic voting
process -- and there isn't consensus in this matter as far as I'm
concerned.
What exactly would you consider "a commitment to MFP and MRP"? As for
myself, they are both on my to-do list. I just don't want to get lost in
endless discussions without having anything done, so I performed the
first step, the AMP. If that is accepted, I fully intend to prepare both
MFP and MRP proposals - unless somebody else does it first. Is that
commitment enough?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
