On 2019-01-16 3:10 p.m., Oliver Charles wrote:
Is there information anywhere on the process for acceptance/rejection criteria. It sounds like hvr can outright reject any proposal - are there others with that power? What is generally required for acceptance? Not meant critically, just interested

Every active member of the commitee has that power. We could contemplate a different approach, like voting, if all members of the commitee were active. When you have only a couple of responses to a proposal, consensus among those who respond is the only possible way to go.



On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, 8:01 pm Mario Blažević <mblaze...@stilo.com <mailto:mblaze...@stilo.com> wrote:

    A month passed since the last call, and I'm sorry to say that the
    Applicative/Monad proposal has been rejected. Herbert has vetoed it on
    the grounds that it doesn't come packaged with MonadFail and
    MonadOfNoReturn proposals.

    This is very unfortunate because (I thought) there was finally a
    glimmer
    of hope for Haskell 2020. The new process used to complete the
    RelaxedPolyRec proposal seemed promising, as it worked around the
    commitee's letargy problem. As it turns out, that wasn't the only
    problem.

    In all fairness, Herbert did state [1] he intends to write up the
    combination of AMP, MFP, and MNRP the way he likes it. I do hope that
    happens, but when and if he submits the combined proposal, I would not
    be surprised if, for example, Philippa should veto it on the grounds
    that it doesn't include the ApplicativeDo proposal that she's been
    vocal
    about. This committee is a far cry from the one that gave us Haskell
    '98.

    A Haskell 2020 report with no AMP would be pointless, in my opinion, so
    I'm going to suspend my work on the report until this issue is
    resolved.
    I still think the best course of action may be to disband the current
    disfunctional committee and form a new one, as I proposed [2] before
    establishing the new process.

    [1] https://github.com/haskell/rfcs/pull/1#issuecomment-448126690
    [2]
    https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/2018-October/004370.html

    _______________________________________________
    Haskell-prime mailing list
    Haskell-prime@haskell.org <mailto:Haskell-prime@haskell.org>
    http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime



--
Mario Blazevic
mblaze...@stilo.com
Stilo International

This message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, or
distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient(s) please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message and any attachments.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to