On 2019-04-19 12:40 a.m., Gershom B wrote:
I don’t really have a stake in what happens to it. In my opinion at the very least the domain should point somewhere where there’s a redirect in place to the old content, or some pointer to it, so links don’t die :-)


I, for one, was looking up the old proposals stored on prime.haskell.org <http://prime.haskell.org> when writing up the new ones. We shouldn't lose that content.



Cheers,
Gershom


On April 18, 2019 at 11:07:22 PM, Ben Gamari (b...@well-typed.com <mailto:b...@well-typed.com>) wrote:

Gershom B <gersh...@gmail.com <mailto:gersh...@gmail.com>> writes:

> geekosaur> looks like the cert on prime.haskell.org <http://prime.haskell.org> expired 6 days ago
>
> Ben, I think this is your dept?
>
I wrote to the Prime committee about their plans for this server but
never heard back. In light of this and the lack of traffic on it I was
operating on the assumption was that there was no need to keep this
server around beyond a static backup. If this isn't the case then we need
to work out who is going to be responsible for it since GHC won't be
administering a Trac instance once git.haskell.org <http://git.haskell.org> is decommissioned.

I'd be happy to help move the instance to GitLab if that is helpful.

Cheers,

- Ben

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime


_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to