With my open source library hat on, CI should be the canary in the
coalmine for my users, not a perfectly reproducible thing that proves
it can be installed on an old version my users aren't using. I think
for public stuff the redirect is exactly the right thing. I also
"stack init" my projects on the CI to test with the latest versions,
which is even worse for breaking consistency. I combine that with CRON
jobs that kick off all my CI things nightly, so I am explicitly
testing for the passage of time.

With my commercial developer hat on, there's no way I'd have
redirected to an arbitrary stack! A very valid strategy for the right
use case.

Thanks for the binaries!

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Emanuel Borsboom <ma...@fpcomplete.com> wrote:
> Ha, my unintelligible English here is probably due to staying up way too
> late getting stack-1.6.1 out :)  Let me try that again...
>
> It might also be good if our CI examples recommend the best practice of
> specifying an exact Stack version by pointing directly to a specific Github
> release rather than using the convenience redirects.  What happened here is
> one example of breakage if CI scripts don't specify a version; another would
> be that a behaviour change in Stack breaks CI.
>
> Also, more importantly, the Windows 32-bit binaries are up now!
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 6:13 AM, Emanuel Borsboom <ma...@fpcomplete.com> wrote:
>
> It might also be good if CI examples we recommend the best practice of
> specifying an exact Stack version by pointing directly to a specific Github
> release rather than using the convenience redirects.  What happened here is
> one example of breakage if CI scripts specify stick to a specific version;
> another would be that a behaviour change in Stack breaks CI.
>
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael.snoy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> We should probably change the way that stackage.org finds binaries. All of
> the old binaries are present on Github still, it's just the lookup that
> isn't working, since it only considered the most recent release.
>
> Yes, this is an ugly situation, we're still trying to play catch-up.
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Neil Mitchell <ndmitch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can I suggest that in future you leave the old binaries around until
>> the new ones are available? My Windows CI automatically hits that URL,
>> so it broke :(
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Michael Snoyman
>> <michael.snoy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I believe there are plans to release it still. As the release
>> > announcement
>> > mentioned, we didn't complete the normal release procedure to rush the
>> > fix
>> > for GHC 8.2, and some binaries are still being compiled.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Neil Mitchell <ndmitch...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The page https://www.stackage.org/stack/ links to
>> >> https://www.stackage.org/stack/windows-i386, which now gives a 404.
>> >> Where did the 32bit binary disappear to?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, Neil
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups
>> >> "haskell-stack" group.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> >> an
>> >> email to haskell-stack+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to haskell-stack@googlegroups.com.
>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >>
>> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/haskell-stack/CAKcFpmJY27nB%3D%2BCiS0_6UZ56ePb-DH_0H7c-0VdommRmWqdD%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "haskell-stack" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to haskell-stack+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to haskell-stack@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/haskell-stack/CAKA2Jg%2BzQRVzCGPgSp%3D%2BWRSoREyzZHgNSyCqozODLgtgUpK7vQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"haskell-stack" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to haskell-stack+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to haskell-stack@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/haskell-stack/CAKcFpmKhpd2LS5at90uwjDHvTDNAnAzmPBKt4jTVZnu7ED8ZVA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to