| Obviously it would be useful if the expected behaviour were documented | more tightly, and conformed across compilers. Which result should we | choose to be standard? (And can the decision please be | recorded in the Haskell 98 errata?) I would welcome a tightened definition, and would add it to the errata; but I am not qualified to produce one. One difficulty is that the definition tries not to be Unix-centric. Simon
- behaviour of System.system? Malcolm Wallace
- Re: behaviour of System.system? Fergus Henderson
- Re: behaviour of System.system? Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: behaviour of System.system? Fergus Henderson
- Re: behaviour of System.system? Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: behaviour of System.system? George Russell