Re: Making argv a constant

[nikhil]

Lennart says:

>    I've sinced changed my mind, maybe it is "a functional programmers
>    deathwish", but I find the case where you are explicit about what a
>    function depends on to be more honest and true to the FP spirit.
>    I've also found it practically useful since you can then change the
>    values of the given flags locally (which you couldn't do with a global
>    argv).

Is this an argument against having lexically scoped variables altogether?

(Iknew you were into supercombinators, but this much? :-)

Nikhil