> Suggestion: Include among the basic types of Haskell a type `Empty' > that contains no value except bottom. Absolutely! But I don't think it should be built in (unless absolutely necessary). It looks ugly, but we could say that a data declaration does not have to have any constructors: data Empty = -- Lennart PS. There are other ways of getting empty types, but they are all convoluted, like data Empty = Empty !Empty
- Haskell 1.3 ian
- Haskell 1.3 ian
- Haskell 1.3 ian
- Re: Haskell 1.3 kh
- Haskell 1.3 "John C. Peterson"
- Re: Haskell 1.3 John Hughes
- Re: Haskell 1.3 John Launchbury
- Re: Haskell 1.3 wadler
- Haskell 1.3 Philip Wadler
- Re: Haskell 1.3 Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 1.3 Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 1.3 Philip Wadler
- Re: Haskell 1.3 Magnus Carlsson
- Re: Haskell 1.3 Ron Wichers Schreur
- Haskell 1.3 Frank Christoph
- Re: Haskell 1.3 peterson-john