> As far as I > can see, this change of semantics doesn't break any existing code; it just > executes it a little more lazily. Maybe that will make some existing code get space-leaks. Sverker
- Pattern matching for solitary constructors Marnix Klooster
- Re: Pattern matching for solitary constructors reid-alastair
- Re: Pattern matching for solitary constructors Sverker Nilsson
- Re: Pattern matching for solitary constructors Fergus Henderson