When I was dabbling with some numerical analysis code a while ago I
noticed what appears to be an overspecification in the way "bounds"
interacts with list comprehensions.  Sometimes it was important that
the bounds be produced in order and this is the behaviour defined in
the manual (1.1 anyway).  However, sometimes I just wanted to iterate
over the bounds in any order (i.e. potentially in parallel) but I
could not find any way to indicate this.  Is the inability to be able
to indicate this a deliberate choice, oversight or just not considered
important?

bevan

Reply via email to