I have been following this discussion with interest and I'd like
some clarification.

Wadler writes:

> But just because they call it `lazy' doesn't mean that it really is
> the essence of laziness.

What is really been called `lazy' and how is the `essence of
laziness' defined?

Also, forgive my ignorance, but what does it mean that 'products
or functions are lifted'?

Thanks,

Sergio Antoy
Dept. of Computer Science
Portland State University
P.O.Box 751
Portland, OR 97207
voice +1 (503) 725-3009
fax   +1 (503) 725-3211
internet [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to