jl writes:
> I feel the need to be inflamatory:
>
> I believe n+k should go.
Again, I agree completely. Let's get rid of this horrible wart
once and for all. It's a special case that makes the language
more difficult to explain and implement. I've hardly seen any
programs using it so I don't think backwards compat is a problem.
Anyone who thinks this change will cause them more than 10
minutes work, plese speak up.
-- Lennart
- Haskell 1.3 (n+k patterns) John Launchbury
- Lennart Augustsson
