Re: Stumped without mutation...

[Joeri van Ruth]

Frank Christoph wrote
> It's partly a failing of Haskell, but
> it is more because of the operating system which is completely biased towards
> imperative languages and hence forces client programs to do practically
> everything even though it could reasonably provide generic algorithms to
> perform the dirty work.

Very interesting remark.  Could you give some examples of things that
an operating system could do to support languages like Haskell?


Joeri van Ruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>